Signal-to-noise ratio of phase sensing telescope interferometers
Francois Henault

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the noise and systematic errors in phase sensing telescope interferometers, focusing on their application in adaptive optics for large telescopes and space coronagraphs, highlighting their accuracy limits and practical use cases.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the uncertainties in phase sensing TIs, including numerical models and practical examples for large telescopes and space applications.
Findings
Photon noise dominates measurement errors for telescopes larger than 10 m.
TI methods are feasible for 10-50 m telescopes depending on conditions.
High sampling of WFE maps is achievable in space-borne coronagraphs.
Abstract
This paper is the third part of a trilogy dealing with the principles, performance and limitations of what I named "Telescope-Interferometers" (TIs). The basic idea consists in transforming one telescope into a Wavefront Error (WFE) sensing device. This can be achieved in two different ways, namely the off axis and phase-shifting TIs. In both cases the Point-Spread Function (PSF) measured in the focal plane of the telescope carries information about the transmitted WFE, which is retrieved by fast and simple algorithms suitable to an Adaptive Optics (AO) regime. Herein are evaluated the uncertainties of both types of TIs, in terms of noise and systematic errors. Numerical models are developed in order to establish the dependence of driving parameters such as useful spectral range, angular size of the observed star, or detector noise on the total WFE measurement error. The latter is found…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
