The effect of radiation pressure on virial black hole mass estimates and the case of Narrow Line Seyfert 1 galaxies
Alessandro Marconi, David Axon, Roberto Maiolino, Tohru Nagao, Guia, Pastorini, Paola Pietrini, Andrew Robinson, Guidetta Torricelli

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that accounting for radiation pressure from ionizing photons significantly improves the accuracy of virial black hole mass estimates in AGNs, especially for Narrow Line Seyfert 1 galaxies, aligning them with standard galaxy relations.
Contribution
It provides an empirical calibration for radiation pressure correction in virial BH mass estimates and shows its consistency with physical models, reducing discrepancies with reverberation mapping.
Findings
Radiation pressure correction reduces mass estimate discrepancies from 0.4 to 0.2 dex.
NLS1 galaxies have BH masses similar to other AGNs after correction.
Including radiation pressure aligns NLS1s with standard MBH-sigma relations.
Abstract
We consider the effect of radiation pressure from ionizing photons on black hole (BH) mass estimates based on the application of the virial theorem to broad emission lines in AGN spectra. BH masses based only on the virial product V^2R and neglecting the effect of radiation pressure can be severely underestimated especially in objects close to the Eddington limit. We provide an empirical calibration of the correction for radiation pressure and we show that it is consistent with a simple physical model in which BLR clouds are optically thick to ionizing radiation and have average column densities of NH~10^23 cm^-2. This value is remarkably similar to what is required in standard BLR photoionization models to explain observed spectra. With the inclusion of radiation pressure the discrepancy between virial BH masses based on single epoch spectra and on reverberation mapping data drops from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
