Photometric redshifts in the SWIRE Survey
Michael Rowan-Robinson (Imperial College London), Tom Babbedge, (Imperial College London), Seb Oliver (University of Sussex), Markos Trichas, (Imperial College London), Stefano Berta (Universita di Padova), Carol, Lonsdale (UCSD), Gene Smith, David Shupe (SSC)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a highly reliable photometric redshift catalogue for the SWIRE survey, utilizing multi-band infrared and optical data with a novel two-pass fitting method to accurately estimate galaxy and AGN redshifts.
Contribution
The study presents a new photometric redshift estimation technique combining galaxy, QSO, and infrared templates, achieving unprecedented accuracy and reliability in a large survey.
Findings
Achieved 3.5% rms accuracy with 7 bands
Catastrophic outliers reduced to ~1%
Catalogue includes 10% high-redshift (z>2) sources
Abstract
We present the SWIRE Photometric Redshift Catalogue, 1025119 redshifts of unprecedented reliability and accuracy. Our method is based on fixed galaxy and QSO templates applied to data at 0.36-4.5 mu, and on a set of 4 infrared emission templates fitted to infrared excess data at 3.6-170 mu. The code involves two passes through the data, to try to optimize recognition of AGN dust tori. A few carefully justified priors are used and are the key to supression of outliers. Extinction, A_V, is allowed as a free parameter. We use a set of 5982 spectroscopic redshifts, taken from the literature and from our own spectroscopic surveys, to analyze the performance of our method as a function of the number of photometric bands used in the solution and the reduced chi^2. For 7 photometric bands the rms value of (z_{phot}-z_{spec})/(1+z_{spec}) is 3.5%, and the percentage of catastrophic outliers is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
