On the role of the WNH phase in the evolution of very massive stars: Enabling the LBV instability with feedback
Nathan Smith, Peter S. Conti

TL;DR
This paper introduces the WNH classification for luminous Wolf-Rayet stars with hydrogen, clarifies their evolutionary status, and links their feedback-driven mass loss to the LBV instability, enhancing understanding of massive star evolution.
Contribution
It defines WNH stars as a distinct class, clarifies their evolutionary phase as pre-LBVs, and explains how feedback from winds influences their progression and instability.
Findings
WNH stars have higher masses than H-free WR stars.
WNH stars' H mass fractions exceed those of LBVs.
Feedback from WNH winds drives LBV instability.
Abstract
(abridged) We propose the new designation ``WNH'' for luminous Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars of the nitrogen sequence with H in their spectra. These are commonly called WNL stars (e.g., WN7h), but this new shorthand avoids confusion because there are late-type WN stars without H and early-type WN stars with H. Clearly differentiating WNH stars from H-free WN stars is critical when discussing progenitors of Type Ib/c SNe and GRBs -- the massive WNH stars are not likely SN progenitors, and are distinct from core-He burning WR stars. We show that the masses of WNH stars are systematically higher than H-poor WR stars (both WN and WC), with little overlap, while H mass fractions of luminous WNH stars exceed those of LBVs. We favor the interpretation that the most luminous WNH stars are still core-H burning, pre-LBVs. While on the main sequence, a star's mass is reduced due to winds while its…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
