Cosmic dynamics in the era of Extremely Large Telescopes
J. Liske, A. Grazian, E. Vanzella, M. Dessauges, M. Viel, L. Pasquini,, M. Haehnelt, S. Cristiani, F. Pepe, G. Avila, P. Bonifacio, F. Bouchy, H., Dekker, B. Delabre, S. D'Odorico, V. D'Odorico, S. Levshakov, C. Lovis, M., Mayor, P. Molaro, L. Moscardini, M.T. Murphy, D. Queloz

TL;DR
This paper explores how next-generation Extremely Large Telescopes could directly measure the universe's expansion rate over time by detecting redshift drift in high-redshift quasars, providing a model-independent test of dark energy.
Contribution
It assesses the feasibility of detecting cosmological redshift drift with future telescopes, specifically quantifying the observational requirements and potential for independent dark energy evidence.
Findings
A 42-m telescope can detect redshift drift over ~20 years with 4000 hours of observation.
Redshift drift measurement is feasible in the 2<z<5 range using Ly alpha forest data.
The method offers a direct, model-independent probe of the universe's expansion and dark energy.
Abstract
The redshifts of all cosmologically distant sources are expected to experience a small, systematic drift as a function of time due to the evolution of the Universe's expansion rate. A measurement of this effect would represent a direct and entirely model-independent determination of the expansion history of the Universe over a redshift range that is inaccessible to other methods. Here we investigate the impact of the next generation of Extremely Large Telescopes on the feasibility of detecting and characterising the cosmological redshift drift. We consider the Lyman alpha forest in the redshift range 2 < z < 5 and other absorption lines in the spectra of high redshift QSOs as the most suitable targets for a redshift drift experiment. Assuming photon-noise limited observations and using extensive Monte Carlo simulations we determine the accuracy to which the redshift drift can be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
