Galaxy Bulges As Tests of CDM vs MOND in Strong Gravity
HongSheng Zhao (StA), Bing-Xiao Xu (GSU), Clare Dobbs (Exeter)

TL;DR
This paper compares CDM and MOND theories in explaining galaxy bulge formation, showing MOND's scalar field better accounts for observed correlations and predicts a universal threshold for galaxy core development.
Contribution
It demonstrates that MOND's scalar field can naturally produce tight galaxy property correlations and a universal formation threshold, unlike CDM.
Findings
MOND's scalar field creates a Newtonian-like effective dark halo.
A critical pressure in MOND links starbursts to bulge formation.
MOND predicts tighter galaxy property correlations than CDM.
Abstract
The tight correlation between galaxy bulges and their central black hole masses likely emerges in a phase of rapid collapse and starburst at high redshift, due to the balance of gravity on gas with the feedback force from starbursts and the wind from the black hole; the average gravity on per unit mass of gas is ~ 2 x 10^-10 m/sec^2 during the star burst phase. This level of gravity could come from the real r^{-1} cusps of Cold Dark Matter (CDM) halos, but the predicted gravity would have a large scatter due to dependence on cosmological parameters and formation histories. Better agreement is found with the gravity from the scalar field in some co-variant versions of MOND, which can create the mirage of a Newtonian effective dark halo of density Pi r^{-1} near the center, where the characteristic surface density Pi=130alpha^{-1} Msun pc^{-2} and alpha is a fundamental constant of order…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
