Bounds on Effective Hamiltonians for Stabilizer Codes
Stephen S. Bullock, Dianne P. O'Leary

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limitations on constructing low-locality effective Hamiltonians for stabilizer codes, providing conditions where such Hamiltonians cannot exist, especially for certain well-known code classes.
Contribution
It establishes theoretical conditions that prevent the existence of low-locality effective Hamiltonians for stabilizer codes, simplifying the analysis for specific code families.
Findings
Effective Hamiltonians do not exist under certain conditions.
Results apply to Calderbank-Shor-Steane and surface code stabilizer codes.
Simplifies understanding of Hamiltonian locality constraints.
Abstract
This manuscript introduces various notions of k-locality of stabilizer codes inherited from the associated stabilizer groups. A choice of generators for the group leads to a Hamiltonian with the code in its groundspace, while a Hamiltonian holding the code in its groundspace might be called effective if its locality is less than that of a natural choice of generators (or any choice). This paper establishes some conditions under which effective Hamiltonians for stabilizer codes do not exist. Our results simplify in the cases of Calderbank-Shor-Steane stabilizer codes and topologically-ordered stabilizer codes arising from surface cellulations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Data Storage Technologies · Coding theory and cryptography · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
