Line Searches in Swift X-ray Spectra
C. P. Hurkett, S. Vaughan, J. P. Osborne, P. T. O'Brien, K. L. Page,, A. Beardmore, O. Godet, D. N. Burrows, M. Capalbi, P. Evans, N. Gehrels, M., R. Goad, J. E. Hill, J. Kennea, T. Mineo, M. Perri, R. Starling

TL;DR
This paper compares three statistical methods for detecting X-ray emission lines in Swift GRB afterglow spectra, finding no strong evidence for lines and establishing detection limits.
Contribution
It evaluates and contrasts existing statistical techniques for line detection, applying them to Swift data to clarify previous claims and set detection thresholds.
Findings
No significant emission lines detected in the sample
Detection limits established for typical Swift-era bursts
Calibration effects influence line detection sensitivity
Abstract
Prior to the launch of the Swift mission several X-ray line detections were reported in Gamma Ray Burst afterglow spectra. To date, these pre-Swift era results have not been conclusively confirmed. The most contentious issue in this area is the choice of statistical method used to evaluate the significance of these features. In this paper we compare three different methods already extant in the literature for assessing the significance of possible line features and discuss their relative advantages and disadvantages. The methods are demonstrated by application to observations of 40 bursts from the archive of Swift XRT at early times (< few ks post trigger in the rest frame of the burst). Based on this thorough analysis we found no strong evidence for emission lines. For each of the three methods we have determined detection limits for emission line strengths in bursts with spectral…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
