Relativistic Perihelion Precession of Orbits of Venus and the Earth
Abhijit Biswas, Krishnan R. S. Mani

TL;DR
This paper calculates the relativistic perihelion precession of Venus and Earth's orbits using an alternative model to Einstein's relativity, confirming the relativistic nature of the phenomenon with observational agreement.
Contribution
It introduces a modified relativistic gravitational model and applies it to compute perihelion precession for Venus and Earth, extending previous Mercury studies.
Findings
Computed precession values agree with observations within uncertainties.
Results align with predictions of general relativity.
Supports the relativistic explanation of perihelion precession.
Abstract
Among all the theories proposed to explain the 'anomalous' perihelion precession of Mercury's orbit announced in 1859 by Le Verrier, the general theory of relativity proposed by Einstein in November 1915, alone could calculate Mercury's 'anomalous' precession with a precision demanded by observational accuracy. Since Mercury's precession was a directly derived result of the full general theory, it was viewed by Einstein as the most critical test of general relativity, amongst the three tests proposed by him. With the advent of the space age, the observational accuracy level has improved further and it became possible to detect this precession for other planetary orbits of the solar system -- viz., Venus and the Earth. This conclusively proved that the phenomenon of 'anomalous' perihelion precession of planetary orbits is really a relativistic effect. Our previous papers presented the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
