
TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between Survey Propagation and Belief Propagation in solving constraint satisfaction problems, showing that SP cannot always be reduced to BP and identifying conditions for such reduction.
Contribution
It demonstrates that SP is not always reducible from BP for general problems and introduces weighted Probabilistic Token Passing as a unifying framework.
Findings
SP may not be reducible from BP in general CSPs
Conditions for reducibility are established
Unified framework for SP algorithms via probabilistic interpretation
Abstract
The Survey Propagation (SP) algorithm for solving -SAT problems has been shown recently as an instance of the Belief Propagation (BP) algorithm. In this paper, we show that for general constraint-satisfaction problems, SP may not be reducible from BP. We also establish the conditions under which such a reduction is possible. Along our development, we present a unification of the existing SP algorithms in terms of a probabilistically interpretable iterative procedure -- weighted Probabilistic Token Passing.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsConstraint Satisfaction and Optimization · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Formal Methods in Verification
