The Inverse Simpson Paradox (How To Win Without Overtly Cheating)
Ora E. Percus, Jerome K. Percus

TL;DR
The paper introduces the Inverse Simpson Paradox, a method to decompose data sets to reverse statistical conclusions, highlighting its potential and limitations depending on data specifics.
Contribution
It presents a novel approach to decompose data to achieve opposite conclusions, expanding understanding of the Simpson Paradox.
Findings
Inverse Simpson decomposition is always possible
The significance of conclusions depends on data details
Method can reverse statistical inferences
Abstract
Given two sets of data which lead to a similar statistical conclusion, the Simpson Paradox describes the tactic of combining these two sets and achieving the opposite conclusion. Depending upon the given data, this may or may not succeed. Inverse Simpson is a method of decomposing a given set of comparison data into two disjoint sets and achieving the opposite conclusion for each one. This is always possible; however, the statistical significance of the conclusions does depend upon the details of the given data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
