Improving Swift-XRT positions of GRBs
P. A. Evans, A.P. Beardmore, M.R. Goad, J.P. Osborne (U. Leicester),, D.N. Burrows (Penn State University), and N. Gehrels (NASA/GSFC)

TL;DR
This paper introduces two automated, PSF-fitting methods to improve the accuracy and precision of Swift-XRT positions of GRBs, enabling rapid and reliable localization crucial for follow-up observations.
Contribution
The paper presents two new automated processes that enhance the accuracy of XRT GRB positions using PSF-fitting and astrometric correction with UVOT stars, improving early localization.
Findings
Positions with 90% error radii <4.4" within 10-20 minutes
Enhanced positions with 90% error radii <2.8" around 2 hours after trigger
Methods are fully automated and account for CCD bad columns
Abstract
Since GRBs fade rapidly, it is important to publish accurate, precise positions at early times. For Swift-detected bursts, the best promptly available position is most commonly the X-ray Telescope (XRT) position. We present two processes, developed by the Swift team at Leicester, which are now routinely used to improve the precision and accuracy of the XRT positions reported by the Swift team. Both methods, which are fully automated, make use of a PSF-fitting approach which accounts for the bad columns on the CCD. The first method yields positions with 90% error radii <4.4" 90% of the time, within 10--20 minutes of the trigger. The second method astrometrically corrects the position using UVOT field stars and the known mapping between the XRT and UVOT detectors, yielding enhanced positions with 90% error radii of <2.8" 90% of the time, usually ~2 hours after the trigger.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
