An Improved Construction of Progression-Free Sets
Michael Elkin

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new, elementary construction that improves the lower bound for the size of dense, progression-free subsets of integers, surpassing Behrend's long-standing result from 1946.
Contribution
The authors present a novel, elementary construction that enhances Behrend's lower bound for progression-free sets by a factor of Theta(\sqrt{ ext{log n}}), demonstrating the previous bound was not optimal.
Findings
Improved lower bound for progression-free sets by a factor of Theta(\sqrt{ ext{log n}})
Construction is elementary and self-contained
Shows Behrend's construction is not optimal
Abstract
The problem of constructing dense subsets S of {1,2,..,n} that contain no arithmetic triple was introduced by Erdos and Turan in 1936. They have presented a construction with |S| = \Omega(n^{\log_3 2}) elements. Their construction was improved by Salem and Spencer, and further improved by Behrend in 1946. The lower bound of Behrend is |S| = Omega({n \over {2^{2 \sqrt{2} \sqrt{\log_2 n}} \cdot \log^{1/4} n}}). Since then the problem became one of the most central, most fundamental, and most intensively studied problems in additive number theory. Nevertheless, no improvement of the lower bound of Behrend was reported since 1946. In this paper we present a construction that improves the result of Behrend by a factor of Theta(\sqrt{\log n}), and shows that |S| = Omega({n \over {2^{2 \sqrt{2} \sqrt{\log_2 n}}}} \cdot \log^{1/4} n). In particular, our result implies that the construction of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNumerical Methods and Algorithms
