Accuracy of Auxiliary Field Approach for Baryons
I.M.Narodetskii, C.Semay, A.I.Veselov

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the accuracy of the auxiliary field formalism in deriving the Effective Hamiltonian for baryons by comparing it with solutions from the Salpeter equation, estimating systematic uncertainties.
Contribution
It provides a systematic comparison between the auxiliary field approach and the Salpeter equation for baryons, assessing the formalism's accuracy.
Findings
Auxiliary field formalism closely matches Salpeter solutions
Estimate of systematic uncertainty due to auxiliary field method
Validation of the auxiliary field approach for baryon studies
Abstract
We provide a check of the accuracy of the auxiliary field formalism used to derive the Effective Hamiltonian for baryons in the Field Correlator Method. To this end we compare the solutions for the Effective Hamiltonian with those obtained from the solution of the Salpeter equation. Comparing these results gives a first estimate of the systematic uncertainty due to the use of the auxiliary field formalism for baryons.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
