Optimal Location of Two Laser-interferometric Detectors for Gravitational Wave Backgrounds at 100 MHz
Atsushi Nishizawa, Seiji Kawamura, Tomotada Akutsu, Koji Arai,, Kazuhiro Yamamoto, Daisuke Tatsumi, Erina Nishida, Masa-aki Sakagami, Takeshi, Chiba, Ryuichi Takahashi, Naoshi Sugiyama

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the optimal placement of two high-frequency gravitational wave detectors, showing that close proximity enhances sensitivity but still remains below existing experimental constraints.
Contribution
It determines the optimal location range for two synchronous-recycling interferometers to maximize sensitivity to high-frequency GWB detection.
Findings
Sensitivity is nearly optimized if detectors are within 0.2 m of each other.
The achievable sensitivity is much lower than existing experimental constraints.
Detector placement has minimal impact on sensitivity within the optimal range.
Abstract
Recently, observational searches for gravitational wave background (GWB) have been developed and given constraints on the energy density of GWB in a broad range of frequencies. These constraints have already resulted in the rejection of some theoretical models of relatively large GWB spectra. However, at 100 MHz, there is no strict upper limit from direct observation, though an indirect limit exists due to He4 abundance due to big-bang nucleosynthesis. In our previous paper, we investigated the detector designs that can effectively respond to GW at high frequencies, where the wavelength of GW is comparable to the size of a detector, and found that the configuration, a so-called synchronous-recycling interferometer is best at these sensitivity. In this paper, we investigated the optimal location of two synchronous-recycling interferometers and derived their cross-correlation sensitivity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
