Average Properties of a Large Sample of z_abs ~ z_em associated Mg II Absorption Line Systems
D.Vanden Berk, P.Khare, D.G.York, G.T.Richards, B.Lundgren,, Y.Alsayyad, V.P.Kulkarni, M.SubbaRao, D.P.Schneider, T. Heckman, S.Anderson,, A.P.S.Crotts, J. Frieman, C. Stoughton, J.T.Lauroesch, P.B.Hall, A.Meiksin,, M. Steffing, J.Vanlandingham

TL;DR
This study analyzes 415 associated Mg II absorption systems in SDSS QSO spectra to understand their dust content, ionization, and relation to QSO properties, revealing higher ionization and dust extinction compared to intervening systems.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of associated and intervening Mg II absorbers, highlighting differences in ionization, dust, and radio properties, and suggests an intrinsic origin for some associated absorbers.
Findings
Associated absorbers have higher ionization than intervening ones.
Dust extinction in associated systems is nearly twice that of intervening systems.
Radio-detected QSOs show more reddening and higher incidence of associated Mg II systems.
Abstract
We have studied a sample of 415 associated (z_ab z_em; relative velocity with respect to QSO <3000km/s) Mg II absorption systems with 1.0<=z_ab<=1.86, in the spectra of SDSS DR3 QSOs, to determine the dust content and ionization state in the absorbers. We studied the dependence of these properties on the properties of the QSOs and also, compared the properties with those of a similarly selected sample of 809 intervening systems (apparent relative velocity with respect to the QSO of >3000km/s), so as to understand their origin. From the analysis of the composite spectra, as well as from the comparison of measured equivalent widths in individual spectra, we conclude that the associated Mg II absorbers have higher apparent ionization, measured by the strength of the C IV absorption lines compared to the Mg II absorption lines, than the intervening absorbers. The ionization so measured…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
