Partnering Strategies for Fitness Evaluation in a Pyramidal Evolutionary Algorithm
Uwe Aickelin, Larry Bull

TL;DR
This paper investigates hierarchical distributed genetic algorithms with various partnering strategies, finding that random partner selection enhances diversity and sampling, thereby improving optimization performance.
Contribution
It introduces a pyramidal evolutionary algorithm framework and evaluates different partner selection schemes, highlighting the effectiveness of random partnering strategies.
Findings
Random partnering yields better diversity and sampling.
Hierarchical sub-populations optimize larger problem parts.
Lower-level sub-populations focus on high-resolution search.
Abstract
This paper combines the idea of a hierarchical distributed genetic algorithm with different inter-agent partnering strategies. Cascading clusters of sub-populations are built from bottom up, with higher-level sub-populations optimising larger parts of the problem. Hence higher-level sub-populations search a larger search space with a lower resolution whilst lower-level sub-populations search a smaller search space with a higher resolution. The effects of different partner selection schemes for (sub-)fitness evaluation purposes are examined for two multiple-choice optimisation problems. It is shown that random partnering strategies perform best by providing better sampling and more diversity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
