Towards a Spectral Technique for Determining Material Geometry Around Evolved Stars: Application to HD 179821
J. Nordhaus (Univ. Rochester), I. Minchev (Univ. Rochester), B., Sargent (Univ. Rochester), W. Forrest (Univ. Rochester), E. G. Blackman, (Univ. Rochester), O. De Marco (AMNH), J. Kastner (RIT), B. Balick (Univ., Washington), A. Frank (Univ. Rochester)

TL;DR
This paper develops a spectral technique to differentiate between dust shell and disc geometries around evolved stars by modeling their spectral energy distributions, applied specifically to HD 179821.
Contribution
It introduces a method combining radiative transfer models to distinguish circumstellar geometries based on spectral data, applied to a case study of HD 179821.
Findings
Both models fit short-wavelength data equally well.
Long-wavelength data favors a spherical dust shell over a disc.
HD 179821 likely has a hotter central star than previously estimated.
Abstract
HD 179821 is an evolved star of unknown progenitor mass range (either post-Asymptotic Giant Branch or post-Red Supergiant) exhibiting a double peaked spectral energy distribution (SED) with a sharp rise from m. Such features have been associated with ejected dust shells or inwardly truncated circumstellar discs. In order to compare SEDs from both systems, we employ a spherically symmetric radiative transfer code and compare it to a radiative, inwardly truncated disc code. As a case study, we model the broad-band SED of HD 179821 using both codes. Shortward of 40 m, we find that both models produce equivalent fits to the data. However, longward of 40 m, the radial density distribution and corresponding broad range of disc temperatures produce excess emission above our spherically symmetric solutions and the observations. For HD 179821, our best fit consists of a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
