Testing quantum correlations versus single-particle properties within Leggett's model and beyond
Cyril Branciard, Nicolas Brunner, Nicolas Gisin, Christian Kurtsiefer,, Antia Lamas-Linares, Alexander Ling, and Valerio Scarani

TL;DR
This paper introduces new, stronger inequalities to test Leggett's nonlocal hidden variable model, demonstrates their experimental violation, and explores the limitations of assigning individual properties to entangled particles.
Contribution
It presents a novel, simplified approach to Leggett-type inequalities, proving their violation and extending the analysis beyond Leggett's model to the properties of entangled particles.
Findings
New inequalities are derived assuming only non-negativity of probabilities.
The simplest inequality is experimentally violated.
Individual properties cannot be ascribed even partially to entangled components.
Abstract
Quantum theory predicts and experiments confirm that nature can produce correlations between distant events that are nonlocal in the sense of violating a Bell inequality. Nevertheless, Bell's strong sentence {\it Correlations cry out for explanations} remains relevant. The maturing of quantum information science and the discovery of the power of nonlocal correlations, e.g. for cryptographic key distribution beyond the standard Quantum Key Distribution schemes, strengthen Bell's wish and make it even more timely. In 2003, Leggett proposed an alternative model for nonlocal correlations [Found. Phys. 33, 1469 (2003)], that he proved to be incompatible with quantum predictions. We present here a new approach to this model, along with new inequalities for testing it. Remarkably these inequalities can be derived in a very simple way, assuming only the non-negativity of probability…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
