Comment on "Direct space-time observation of pulse tunneling in an electromagnetic band gap"
G. Nimtz, A.A. Stahlhofen

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous study on electromagnetic pulse tunneling, arguing that the original investigation's conclusions about the tunneling process are invalid.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis challenging the validity of prior experimental claims on electromagnetic pulse tunneling.
Findings
The original study's interpretation of tunneling is flawed.
The critique questions the experimental evidence for direct space-time observation.
It emphasizes the need for careful analysis in tunneling experiments.
Abstract
The investigation presented by Doiron, Hache, and Winful [Phys. Rev. A 76, 023823 (2007)] is not valid for the tunneling process as claimed in the paper.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum optics and atomic interactions · Geophysics and Sensor Technology · Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
