On why the Iron K-shell absorption in AGN is not a signature of the local Warm/Hot Intergalactic Medium
James Reeves, Chris Done, Ken Pounds, Yuichi Terashima, Kiyoshi, Hayashida, Naohisa Anabuki

TL;DR
This study compares X-ray observations of quasar PG1211+143 to demonstrate that iron K-shell absorption features are caused by AGN outflows, not local intergalactic hot gas, challenging previous interpretations.
Contribution
It provides evidence that iron K-shell absorption in AGN is due to outflows rather than local hot intergalactic medium, based on variability and physical constraints.
Findings
Absorption variability indicates a compact, dense absorber.
Absorber properties are inconsistent with local hot gas origins.
Absorption is linked to AGN outflows, not the local intergalactic medium.
Abstract
We present a comparison between the 2001 XMM-Newton and 2005 Suzaku observations of the quasar, PG1211+143 at z=0.0809. Variability is observed in the 7 keV iron K-shell absorption line (at 7.6 keV in the quasar frame), which is significantly weaker in 2005 than during the 2001 XMM-Newton observation. From a recombination timescale of <4 years, this implies an absorber density n>0.004 particles/cm3, while the absorber column is 5e22<N_H <1 1e24 particles/cm2. Thus the sizescale of the absorber is too compact (pc scale) and the surface brightness of the dense gas too high (by 9-10 orders of magnitude) to arise from local hot gas, such as the local bubble, group or Warm/Hot Intergalactic Medium (WHIM), as suggested by McKernan et al. (2004, 2005). Instead the iron K-shell absorption must be associated with an AGN outflow with mildly relativistic velocities. Finally we show that the the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
