The hidden X-ray breaks in afterglow light curves
P.A. Curran (1), A.J. van der Horst (1,2), R.A.M.J. Wijers (1), R.L.C., Starling (3) ((1) University of Amsterdam, (2) University of Alabama at, Huntsville, (3) University of Leicester)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the possibility that X-ray breaks in GRB afterglow light curves are often hidden, leading to misinterpretation of jet breaks and affecting our understanding of GRB physics and their use as standard candles.
Contribution
It demonstrates how hidden X-ray breaks can be identified through simulations and discusses methods for better detection using multi-wavelength analysis.
Findings
Hidden breaks exist in well-sampled light curves.
Monte Carlo simulations reveal trends in X-ray light curves.
Multi-wavelength analysis improves break detection.
Abstract
Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) afterglow observations in the Swift era have a perceived lack of achromatic jet breaks compared to the BeppoSAX, or pre-Swift era. Specifically, relatively few breaks, consistent with jet breaks, are observed in the X-ray light curves of these bursts. If these breaks are truly missing, it has serious consequences for the interpretation of GRB jet collimation and energy requirements, and the use of GRBs as standard candles. Here we address the issue of X-ray breaks which are possibly 'hidden' and hence the light curves are misinterpreted as being single power-laws. We show how a number of precedents, including GRB 990510 & GRB 060206, exist for such hidden breaks and how, even with the well sampled light curves of the Swift era, these breaks may be left misidentified. We do so by synthesising X-ray light curves and finding general trends via Monte Carlo analysis.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
