GMASS Ultradeep Spectroscopy of Galaxies at 1.4<z<2. II. Superdense passive galaxies: how did they form and evolve ?
A. Cimatti (Universita` di Bologna - Dipartimento di Astronomia), P., Cassata (LAM), L. Pozzetti (INAF - OABO), J. Kurk (MPIA Heidelberg), M., Mignoli (INAF - OABO), A. Renzini (INAF - OAPD), E. Daddi (CEA Saclay), M., Bolzonella (INAF - OABO), M. Brusa (MPE Garching)

TL;DR
This study combines deep spectroscopy, photometry, and imaging to analyze superdense passive galaxies at 1.4<z<2, revealing their compact sizes, old stellar populations, and potential origins from high-redshift starbursts, informing galaxy formation theories.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed spectroscopic and morphological analysis of superdense passive galaxies at z~1.4-2, linking them to earlier starburst events and challenging simple passive evolution models.
Findings
Galaxies have old stellar ages (~1 Gyr) and high stellar mass surface densities.
Their sizes are much smaller than local spheroids, with R_e <~ 1 kpc.
Superdense relics are rare at z~0, suggesting significant size evolution.
Abstract
We combine ultradeep optical spectroscopy from the GMASS project ("Galaxy Mass Assembly ultradeep Spectroscopic Survey") with GOODS multi-band photometry and HST imaging to study a sample of passive galaxiesat 1.39<z<1.99 selected at 4.5 microns. A stacked spectrum with an equivalent integration time of ~500 hours was obtained is publicly released. The spectral and photometric SED properties indicate very weak or absent star formation, moderately old stellar ages of ~1 Gyr (for solar metallicity) and stellar masses in the range of 10^{10-11} solar masses, thus implying that the major star formation and assembly processes for these galaxies occurred at z>2. These galaxies have morphologies that are predominantly compact and spheroidal.However, their sizes (R_e <~ 1 kpc) are much smaller than those of spheroids in the present--day Universe. Their stellar mass surface densities are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
