Hot self-similar relativistic MHD flows
Nadia L. Zakamska (1,2), Mitchell C. Begelman (3,4), Roger D., Blandford (5) ((1) IAS, (2) Spitzer fellow, (3) JILA, (4) UColorado, (5), Stanford)

TL;DR
This paper derives self-similar solutions for axisymmetric relativistic MHD jets, analyzing their structure, magnetic fields, and emission properties, and relates these models to observed features like limb-brightening and polarization in astrophysical jets.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive set of self-similar steady-state solutions for relativistic MHD jets with detailed analysis of their structure and emission characteristics.
Findings
Jets with opening angles smaller than 1/γ can maintain lateral pressure equilibrium.
Magnetic pinch effects and boundary pile-up influence jet morphology and emission.
Polarization patterns depend strongly on projection effects and emissivity distribution.
Abstract
We consider axisymmetric relativistic jets with a toroidal magnetic field and an ultrarelativistic equation of state, with the goal of studying the lateral structure of jets whose pressure is matched to the pressure of the medium through which they propagate. We find all self-similar steady-state solutions of the relativistic MHD equations for this setup. One of the solutions is the case of a parabolic jet being accelerated by the pressure gradient as it propagates through a medium with pressure declining as p(z)\propto z^{-2}. As the jet material expands due to internal pressure gradients, it runs into the ambient medium resulting in a pile-up of material along the jet boundary, while the magnetic field acts to produce a magnetic pinch along the axis of the jet. Such jets can be in a lateral pressure equilibrium only if their opening angle \theta_j at distance z is smaller than about…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
