A Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Survey of K-selected Galaxies at z~2.3: Redshifts and Implications for Broadband Photometric Studies
Mariska Kriek, Pieter G. van Dokkum, Marijn Franx, Garth D., Illingworth, Danilo Marchesini, Ryan Quadri, Gregory Rudnick, Edward N., Taylor, Natascha M. Forster Schreiber, Eric Gawiser, Ivo Labbe, Paulina Lira, and Stijn Wuyts

TL;DR
This study uses near-infrared spectroscopy to accurately determine redshifts of K-selected galaxies at z~2.3, assessing the reliability of broadband photometric methods and improving constraints on galaxy properties.
Contribution
First spectroscopic survey of K-selected galaxies at z~2.3 that quantifies photometric redshift errors and improves stellar property constraints using spectral data.
Findings
Photometric redshifts have a systematic error of 0.08 and a random error of 0.13 in dz/(1+z).
Spectroscopy significantly improves constraints on stellar population parameters.
Photometric studies may overestimate massive galaxy counts at z=2-3.
Abstract
Using the Gemini Near-InfraRed Spectrograph (GNIRS), we have completed a near-infrared spectroscopic survey for K-bright galaxies at z~2.3, selected from the MUSYC survey. We derived spectroscopic redshifts from emission lines or from continuum features and shapes for all 36 observed galaxies. The continuum redshifts are driven by the Balmer/4000 Angstrom break, and have an uncertainty in dz/(1+z) of <0.019. We use this unique sample to determine, for the first time, how accurately redshifts and other properties of massive high-redshift galaxies can be determined from broadband photometric data alone. We find that the photometric redshifts of the galaxies in our sample have a systematic error of 0.08 and a random error of 0.13 in dz/(1+z). The systematic error can be reduced by using optimal templates and deep photometry; the random error, however, will be hard to reduce below 5%. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
