Is a Classical Language Adequate in Assessing the Detectability of the Redshifted 21cm Signal from the Early Universe?
Abraham Loeb (Harvard)

TL;DR
This paper examines whether the classical radiometer equation remains valid for detecting the faint 21cm signals from the early universe, especially when the photon occupation number is low, by considering the influence of bright foregrounds.
Contribution
The study clarifies the conditions under which the classical radiometer equation can be applied to 21cm cosmology, even when the signal photons are few, due to the dominance of foreground photons.
Findings
The radiometer equation remains valid despite low signal photon occupation numbers.
Foreground photons with high occupation numbers justify classical detection assumptions.
The analysis supports current observational strategies for high-redshift 21cm signals.
Abstract
The classical radiometer equation is commonly used to calculate the detectability of the 21cm emission by diffuse cosmic hydrogen at high redshifts. However, the classical description is only valid in the regime where the occupation number of the photons in phase space is much larger than unity and they collectively behave as a classical electromagnetic field. At redshifts z<20, the spin temperature of the intergalactic gas is dictated by the radiation from galaxies and the brightness temperature of the emitting gas is in the range of mK, independently from the existence of the cosmic microwave background. In regions where the observed brightness temperature of the 21cm signal is smaller than the observed photon energy, of 68/(1+z) mK, the occupation number of the signal photons is smaller than unity. Neverethless, the radiometer equation can still be used in this regime because the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
