Studies of regular and random magnetic fields in the ISM: statistics of polarization vectors and the Chandrasekhar-Fermi technique
D. Falceta-Goncalves (NAT-Unicsul, UW-Madison), A. Lazarian, (UW-Madison), G. Kowal (UW-Madison)

TL;DR
This study uses 3D simulations to analyze how magnetic field properties influence polarization measurements in the interstellar medium, providing a refined method to estimate magnetic field strength with improved accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces a generalized equation for the Chandrasekhar-Fermi method that accurately estimates magnetic field strength from polarization maps, considering turbulence and observational effects.
Findings
Polarization angle dispersion depends on magnetic field orientation and Alfvenic Mach number.
The second order structure function of polarization angle relates solely to Alfvenic Mach number.
A generalized CF equation estimates magnetic field strength with less than 20% error.
Abstract
Polarimetry is extensively used as a tool to trace the interstellar magnetic field projected on the plane of sky. Moreover, it is also possible to estimate the magnetic field intensity from polarimetric maps based on the Chandrasekhar-Fermi method. In this work, we present results for turbulent, isothermal, 3-D simulations of sub/supersonic and sub/super-Alfvenic cases. With the cubes, assuming perfect grain alignment, we created synthetic polarimetric maps for different orientations of the mean magnetic field with respect to the line of sight (LOS). We show that the dispersion of the polarization angle depends on the angle of the mean magnetic field regarding the LOS and on the Alfvenic Mach number. However, the second order structure function of the polarization angle follows the relation , being dependent exclusively on the Alfvenic Mach number. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
