A general test of the Copernican Principle
Chris Clarkson, Bruce A. Bassett, Teresa Hui-Ching Lu (UCT & SAAO,, Cape Town)

TL;DR
This paper proposes a model-independent observational test for the Copernican Principle, which is crucial for understanding cosmic acceleration and challenges the assumption that we occupy a typical position in the universe.
Contribution
It introduces a general, automated observational test for the Copernican Principle that does not depend on dark energy models or gravity theories.
Findings
Test can be implemented automatically with upcoming data
Independent of dark energy or gravity models
Challenges the assumption of our typical cosmic position
Abstract
The recent discovery of apparent cosmic acceleration has highlighted the depth of our ignorance of the fundamental properties of nature. It is commonly assumed that the explanation for acceleration must come from a new form of energy dominating the cosmos - dark energy - or a modification of Einstein's theory of Relativity. It is often overlooked, however, that a currently viable alternative explanation of the data is radial inhomogeneity which alters the Hubble diagram without any acceleration. This explanation is often ignored for two reasons: radial inhomogeneity significantly complicates analysis and predictions, and so the full details have not been investigated; and it is a philosophically highly controversial idea, revoking as it does the long-held Copernican Principle. To date, there has not been a general way of determining the validity if the Copernican Principle -- that we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
