Non-Gaussian distributions under scrutiny
Thierry Dauxois (Phys-ENS)

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of careful interpretation of non-Gaussian data, particularly cautioning against over-reliance on q-Gaussian models without thorough validation.
Contribution
It provides a critical commentary on the misuse of q-Gaussian distributions in modeling non-Gaussian data, highlighting potential pitfalls.
Findings
Warns against misinterpreting non-Gaussian data as q-Gaussians
Highlights the need for careful statistical analysis
Calls for rigorous validation of distribution assumptions
Abstract
Comment of the very interesting paper by Hilhorst & Schehr, J. Stat. Mech. P06003 (2007). The main point is that one should be extremely careful when interpreting non-Gaussian data in terms of q-Gaussians.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
