The Optical-Radio Mapping: the kinetic efficiency of Radio-Loud AGNs
Francesco Shankar (1), Alfonso Cavaliere (2), Michele Cirasuolo (3), and Laura Maraschi (4) ((1) OSU, USA; (2) Tor Vergata, Italy; (3) SUPA,, Scotland (4)-INAF-Oss. Astr. Brera, Italy)

TL;DR
This paper estimates the average kinetic efficiency of radio-loud AGNs by comparing optical and radio luminosity functions, finding a typical efficiency of around 1% and suggesting radio sources contribute significantly to black hole growth.
Contribution
It provides a novel empirical constraint on the kinetic efficiency of radio-loud AGNs using luminosity functions and Monte Carlo simulations, linking radio emission to black hole accretion.
Findings
Kinetic efficiency g_k ≈ 0.10 with scatter ~0.38 dex.
Radio sources contribute at least 25% to local black hole mass density.
Estimated kinetic efficiency ε_k ≈ 0.01 for jet/wind production.
Abstract
We constrain the mean kinetic efficiency of radio-loud active galactic nuclei by using an optically selected sample for which both the optical and the radio luminosity functions (LFs) have been determined; the former traces the bolometric luminosity L, while the latter traces the kinetic power L_k, empirically correlated to the radio emission. Thus in terms of the ratio g_k=L_k/L, we can convert the optical LF of the sample into a radio one. This computed LF is shown to match the directly observed LF for the same sample if g_k=0.10^{+0.05}_{-0.01} holds, with a scatter \sigma=0.38^{+0.04}_{-0.09} dex; with these values we also match a number of independent correlations between L_k, L and radio emission, that we derive through Monte Carlo simulations. We proceed to translate the value of g_k into a constraint on the kinetic efficiency for the production of radio jets or winds, namely,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
