Central cross-sections make surfaces of revolution quadric
Bruce Solomon

TL;DR
This paper proves that surfaces of revolution with centrally symmetric cross-sections are necessarily quadric surfaces, establishing a unique geometric characterization of quadrics among such surfaces.
Contribution
It introduces a new geometric criterion based on central symmetry of cross-sections to identify quadrics among surfaces of revolution.
Findings
Surfaces of revolution with symmetric cross-sections are necessarily quadrics.
Quadrics are the only revolution surfaces without skewloops.
The result extends to higher-dimensional hypersurfaces.
Abstract
We prove here that when all planes transverse and nearly perpendicular to the axis of a surface of revolution intersect it in loops having central symmetry, the surface must be quadric. It follows that the quadrics are the only surfaces of revolution without skewloops. Similar statements hold for hypersurfaces of revolution in higher dimensions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematics and Applications · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
