Chaos Synchronization with Dynamic Filters: Two Way is Better Than One Way
Ido Kanter, Evi Kopelowitz, Johannes Kestler, Wolfgang Kinzel

TL;DR
This paper explores how two-way interaction with dynamic private filters enhances chaos synchronization and security, showing that mutual exchange outperforms one-way drive in complex systems and secure communications.
Contribution
It demonstrates that dynamic private filters prevent synchronization in one-way systems, highlighting the superiority of two-way interaction for secure chaos-based communication.
Findings
Two-way interaction enables synchronization with public parameters.
Private filters prevent synchronization, enhancing security.
Dynamic filters make the chaotic trajectory unrecoverable.
Abstract
Two chaotic systems which interact by mutually exchanging a signal built from their delayed internal variables, can synchronize. A third unit may be able to record and to manipulate the exchanged signal. Can the third unit synchronize to the common chaotic trajectory, as well? If all parameters of the system are public, a proof is given that the recording system can synchronize as well. However, if the two interacting systems use private commutative filters to generate the exchanged signal, a driven system cannot synchronize. It is shown that with dynamic private filters the chaotic trajectory even cannot be calculated. Hence two way (interaction) is more than one way (drive). The implication of this general result to secret communication with chaos synchronization is discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsChaos control and synchronization · Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
