The Afterglows of Swift-era Gamma-Ray Bursts. I. Comparing pre-Swift and Swift era Long/Soft (Type II) GRB Optical Afterglows
D. A. Kann, S. Klose, B. Zhang, D. Malesani, E. Nakar, A. Pozanenko,, A. C. Wilson, N. R. Butler, P. Jakobsson, S. Schulze, M. Andreev, L. A., Antonelli, I. F. Bikmaev, V. Biryukov, M. B\"ottcher, R. A. Burenin, J. M., Castro Cer\'on, A. J. Castro-Tirado, G. Chincarini

TL;DR
This study compares optical afterglows of Swift-era and pre-Swift gamma-ray bursts, analyzing their luminosities, host galaxy extinction, and energy correlations to understand their properties and differences.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of optical afterglows from Swift and pre-Swift GRBs, including new data and extinction analysis, challenging previous luminosity clustering findings.
Findings
Luminosity distributions are similar between Swift and pre-Swift samples.
Host galaxy extinction accounts for some fainter afterglows.
No significant luminosity difference between GRBs with and without foreground absorbers.
Abstract
We have gathered optical photometry data from the literature on a large sample of Swift-era gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows including GRBs up to September 2009, for a total of 76 GRBs, and present an additional three pre-Swift GRBs not included in an earlier sample. Furthermore, we publish 840 additional new photometry data points on a total of 42 GRB afterglows, including large data sets for GRBs 050319, 050408, 050802, 050820A, 050922C, 060418, 080413A and 080810. We analyzed the light curves of all GRBs in the sample and derived spectral energy distributions for the sample with the best data quality, allowing us to estimate the host galaxy extinction. We transformed the afterglow light curves into an extinction-corrected z=1 system and compared their luminosities with a sample of pre-Swift afterglows. The results of a former study, which showed that GRB afterglows clustered and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
