Apports des d\'emarches d'inspection et des tests d'usage dans l'\'evaluation de l'accessibilit\'e de E-services
Marc-Eric Bobiller-Chaumon (GRePS), Fran\c{c}oise Sandoz-Guermond, (LIESP)

TL;DR
This paper compares inspection and usage testing methods for evaluating E-services accessibility, finding that usage tests more effectively identify usability issues for people with disabilities.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative analysis of inspection and usage testing techniques for E-service accessibility evaluation, highlighting the superior problem detection rate of usage tests.
Findings
Usage tests identify more accessibility issues for disabled users.
Inspection methods are less effective in detecting usability problems.
Usage testing shows higher problem detection rates.
Abstract
This article proposes to describe and compare the contributions of various techniques of evaluation of the accessibility of E-services carried out starting from (i) methods of inspection (on the basis of traditional ergonomic criteria and accessibility) and (ii) of tests of use. It show that these are the latter which show the best rate of identification of the problems of uses for the poeple with disabilities
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDigital Accessibility for Disabilities · Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility · Hearing Impairment and Communication
