Probing bilinear R-parity violating supergravity at the LHC
F. de Campos, O. J. P. Eboli, M. B. Magro, W. Porod, D. Restrepo, M., Hirsch, J. W. F. Valle

TL;DR
This paper investigates how bilinear R-parity violation in supergravity models affects supersymmetry searches at the LHC, highlighting both challenges due to reduced missing energy signals and opportunities from enhanced same-sign dilepton and trilepton events.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of collider signatures of bilinear R-parity violating supergravity, including the impact on standard searches and the potential of displaced vertex detection.
Findings
R-parity violation reduces missing energy signals in SUSY searches.
Enhanced same-sign dilepton and trilepton final states improve detection prospects.
Displaced vertex searches significantly extend the parameter space coverage.
Abstract
We study the collider phenomenology of bilinear R-parity violating supergravity, the simplest effective model for supersymmetric neutrino masses accounting for the current neutrino oscillation data. At the CERN Large Hadron Collider the center-of-mass energy will be high enough to probe directly these models through the search for the superpartners of the Standard Model (SM) particles. We analyze the impact of R-parity violation on the canonical supersymmetry searches - that is, we examine how the decay of the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) via bilinear R-parity violating interactions degrades the average expected missing momentum of the reactions and show how this diminishes the reach in the 'usual' channels for supersymmetry searches. However, the R-parity violating interactions lead to an enhancement of the final states containing isolated same-sign di-leptons and trileptons,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
