Improved parameters for the transiting planet HD 17156b: a high-density giant planet with a very eccentric orbit
M. Gillon (1, 2), A. H. M. J. Triaud (1), M. Mayor (1), D. Queloz (1),, S. Udry (1), P. North (3) ((1) Observatoire de Geneve, Sauverny, Switzerland;, (2) Institut d'Astrophysique et de Geophysique, Universite de Liege, Liege,, Belgium; (3) Laboratoire d'Astrophysique

TL;DR
This study refines the parameters of HD 17156b, revealing it as a high-density giant planet with a notably eccentric orbit, based on combined high-precision photometry and radial velocity data analyzed through MCMC methods.
Contribution
The paper provides improved measurements of HD 17156b's mass, radius, and orbit, highlighting its high density and eccentricity with a comprehensive combined analysis approach.
Findings
Mass of 3.09 M_Jup with uncertainties
Radius of 1.23 R_Jup with uncertainties
High orbital eccentricity of 0.6719
Abstract
We report high-precision transit photometry for the recently detected planet HD 17156b. Using these new data with previously published transit photometry and radial velocity measurements, we perform a combined analysis based on a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach. The resulting mass M_p = 3.09 (+0.22-0.17) M_Jup and radius R_p = 1.23 (+0.17-0.20) R_Jup for the planet places it at the outer edge of the density distribution of known transiting planets with rho_p = 1.66 (+1.37-0.60) rho_Jup. The obtained transit ephemeris is T_tr = 2454438.48271 (+0.00077-0.00057) + N x 21.21747 (+0.00070-0.00067) BJD. The derived plausible tidal circularization time scales for HD 17156b are larger than the age of the host star. The measured high orbital eccentricity e = 0.6719 (+0.0052-0.0063) can thus not be interpreted as the clear sign of the presence of another body in the system.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
