Size of spectroscopic calibration samples for cosmic shear photometric redshifts
Zhaoming Ma, Gary Bernstein

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the size of spectroscopic calibration samples affects the accuracy of photometric redshifts in cosmic shear surveys, emphasizing the importance of modeling complex error distributions.
Contribution
It introduces a method to constrain arbitrary parametric photo-z error models and quantifies how model complexity impacts calibration sample size requirements.
Findings
Multi-Gaussian models require up to 5 times larger calibration samples.
Calibration sample size saturates at around 4 Gaussian components.
Assuming a single Gaussian underestimates uncertainties by up to 35%.
Abstract
Weak gravitational lensing surveys using photometric redshifts can have their cosmological constraints severely degraded by errors in the photo-z scale. We explore the cosmological degradation vs the size of the spectroscopic survey required to calibrate the photo-z probability distribution. Previous work has assumed a simple Gaussian distribution of photo-z errors; here we describe a method for constraining an arbitrary parametric photo-z error model. As an example we allow the photo-z probability distribution to be the sum of Gaussians. To limit cosmological degradation to a fixed level, photo-z models with multiple Gaussians require up to 5 times larger calibration sample than one would estimate from assuming a single-Gaussian model. This degradation saturates at . Assuming a single Gaussian when the photo-z distribution has multiple parameters underestimates…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
