X-ray Timing Analysis of Six Pulsars Using ESA's XMM-Newton Observatory
A. Martin-Carrillo, M. Kirsch, E. Kendziorra, R. Staubert

TL;DR
This study analyzes six isolated pulsars using ESA's XMM-Newton observatory to assess the timing accuracy of the EPIC-pn camera, finding it to be around 1e-8, which supports its calibration utility.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed assessment of the relative timing accuracy of the EPIC-pn camera across multiple pulsars with different profiles.
Findings
Timing accuracy of EPIC-pn camera is approximately 1×10⁻⁸.
Validated the stability of pulsar timing measurements with XMM-Newton.
Demonstrated the suitability of selected pulsars for calibration purposes.
Abstract
We present results of a timing analysis of various isolated pulsars using ESA's \emph{XMM-Newton} observatory. Isolated pulsars are useful for calibration purposes because of their stable emission. We have analyzed six pulsars with different pulse profiles in a range of periods between 15 and 200 ms. All observations were made using the \emph{EPIC-pn camera} in its faster modes (Small window, Timing and Burst modes). We investigate the relative timing accuracy of the camera by comparing the pulse periods determined from the \emph{EPIC-pn camera} observations with those from radio observations. As a result of our analysis we conclude that the relative timing accuracy of the \emph{EPIC-pn camera} is of the order of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations · Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research · Particle Detector Development and Performance
