Undecidable Problems About Timed Automata
Olivier Finkel (ELM)

TL;DR
This paper proves several fundamental decision problems about timed automata are undecidable, including determinization, language complement, clock minimization, and language shuffle, with some problems being highly undecidable beyond the arithmetical hierarchy.
Contribution
It establishes the undecidability of key problems in timed automata theory, advancing understanding of their computational limits.
Findings
Decidability of automaton determinization is impossible.
Complement of a timed regular language cannot be decided.
Minimizing clocks in a timed automaton is undecidable.
Abstract
We solve some decision problems for timed automata which were recently raised by S. Tripakis in [ Folk Theorems on the Determinization and Minimization of Timed Automata, in the Proceedings of the International Workshop FORMATS'2003, LNCS, Volume 2791, p. 182-188, 2004 ] and by E. Asarin in [ Challenges in Timed Languages, From Applied Theory to Basic Theory, Bulletin of the EATCS, Volume 83, p. 106-120, 2004 ]. In particular, we show that one cannot decide whether a given timed automaton is determinizable or whether the complement of a timed regular language is timed regular. We show that the problem of the minimization of the number of clocks of a timed automaton is undecidable. It is also undecidable whether the shuffle of two timed regular languages is timed regular. We show that in the case of timed B\"uchi automata accepting infinite timed words some of these problems are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
