The Importance of Being First: Position Dependent Citation Rates on arXiv:astro-ph
J. P. Dietrich

TL;DR
This study investigates how the position of e-prints in arXiv's astro-ph listings affects their citation counts, revealing a significant top-position advantage likely influenced by self-promotion and visibility.
Contribution
It provides the first quantitative analysis of position-dependent citation effects on arXiv astro-ph listings and tests potential explanations for this phenomenon.
Findings
Top-listed papers receive twice as many citations as lower-listed ones.
Self-promotion and visibility contribute to the positional citation effect.
Proposed mitigation strategies include randomizing listings and relevance-based sorting.
Abstract
We study the dependence of citation counts of e-prints published on the arXiv:astro-ph server on their position in the daily astro-ph listing. Using the SPIRES literature database we reconstruct the astro-ph listings from July 2002 to December 2005 and determine citation counts for e-prints from their ADS entry. We use Zipf plots to analyze the citation distributions for each astro-ph position. We find that e-prints appearing at or near the top of the astro-ph mailings receive significantly more citations than those further down the list. This difference is significant at the 7 sigma level and on average amounts to two times more citations for papers at the top than those further down the listing. We propose three possible non-exclusive explanations for this positional citation effect and try to test them. We conclude that self-promotion by authors plays a role in the observed effect…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
