Understanding the small object argument
Richard Garner

TL;DR
This paper introduces an algebraic refinement of the small object argument, addressing its lack of universal property, convergence issues, and disconnection from other transfinite constructions in categorical algebra.
Contribution
It provides an algebraic version of the small object argument within natural weak factorisation systems, fixing key deficiencies.
Findings
The refined argument has a universal property.
It guarantees convergence of the construction.
It establishes connections with other transfinite categorical algebra methods.
Abstract
The small object argument is a transfinite construction which, starting from a set of maps in a category, generates a weak factorisation system on that category. As useful as it is, the small object argument has some problematic aspects: it possesses no universal property; it does not converge; and it does not seem to be related to other transfinite constructions occurring in categorical algebra. In this paper, we give an "algebraic" refinement of the small object argument, cast in terms of Grandis and Tholen's natural weak factorisation systems, which rectifies each of these three deficiencies.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
