Low-Energy Effective Theory, Unitarity, and Non-Decoupling Behavior in a Model with Heavy Higgs-Triplet Fields
R. Sekhar Chivukula, Neil D. Christensen, and Elizabeth H. Simmons

TL;DR
This paper analyzes a model with a Higgs doublet and triplet, showing how heavy triplet states affect low-energy physics, unitarity, and the non-decoupling behavior, with implications for the triplet mass scale and electroweak phenomenology.
Contribution
It constructs the low-energy effective theory for a Higgs triplet model and clarifies the non-decoupling behavior and unitarity constraints related to heavy triplet bosons.
Findings
Perturbative unitarity breaks down at a scale inversely related to the triplet VEV.
Heavy triplet bosons do not decouple at one-loop, but the model remains consistent with decoupling theorem.
Triplet-Higgs masses at GUT scale require a negligible triplet VEV for perturbative consistency.
Abstract
We discuss the properties of a model incorporating both a scalar electroweak Higgs doublet and an electroweak Higgs triplet. We construct the low-energy effective theory for the light Higgs-doublet in the limit of small (but nonzero) deviations in the rho parameter from one, a limit in which the triplet states become heavy. For small deviations in the rho parameter from one, perturbative unitarity of WW scattering breaks down at a scale inversely proportional to the renormalized vacuum expectation value of the triplet field (or, equivalently, inversely proportional to the square-root of the deviation of the rho parameter from one). This result imposes an upper limit on the mass-scale of the heavy triplet bosons in a perturbative theory; we show that this upper bound is consistent with dimensional analysis in the low-energy effective theory. Recent articles have shown that the triplet…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
