Computational Complexity of interacting electrons and fundamental limitations of Density Functional Theory
Norbert Schuch, Frank Verstraete

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that fundamental computational complexity limits the effectiveness of Density Functional Theory (DFT) in quantum mechanics, linking its computational difficulty to the hardness of solving certain quantum problems even with quantum computers.
Contribution
It establishes a theoretical connection between the computational complexity of quantum problems and the limitations of DFT, showing that an efficient universal functional would imply solving QMA-hard problems.
Findings
Finding the ground state energy of the Hubbard model is QMA-hard.
Efficiently computing the universal functional would solve NP problems in polynomial time.
Quantum computing insights reveal fundamental limits of DFT.
Abstract
One of the central problems in quantum mechanics is to determine the ground state properties of a system of electrons interacting via the Coulomb potential. Since its introduction by Hohenberg, Kohn, and Sham, Density Functional Theory (DFT) has become the most widely used and successful method for simulating systems of interacting electrons, making their original work one of the most cited in physics. In this letter, we show that the field of computational complexity imposes fundamental limitations on DFT, as an efficient description of the associated universal functional would allow to solve any problem in the class QMA (the quantum version of NP) and thus particularly any problem in NP in polynomial time. This follows from the fact that finding the ground state energy of the Hubbard model in an external magnetic field is a hard problem even for a quantum computer, while given the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
