Weak distinction and the optimal definition of causal continuity
E. Minguzzi

TL;DR
This paper introduces feeble distinction, a new causality property that can replace the traditional distinction condition in defining causal continuity, providing new characterizations and implications within causality theory.
Contribution
It proposes feeble distinction as a weaker alternative to distinction in causal continuity and explores its properties and relationships with reflectivity.
Findings
Feeble distinction can replace distinction in causal continuity.
Feeble distinction and reflectivity imply weaker forms of distinction.
New characterizations of weak distinction and reflectivity are provided.
Abstract
Causal continuity is usually defined by imposing the conditions (i) distinction and (ii) reflectivity. It is proved here that a new causality property which stays between weak distinction and causality, called feeble distinction, can actually replace distinction in the definition of causal continuity. An intermediate proof shows that feeble distinction and future (past) reflectivity implies past (resp. future) distinction. Some new characterizations of weak distinction and reflectivity are given.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
