Density perturbations in f(R) gravity theories in metric and Palatini formalisms
Shinji Tsujikawa, Kotub Uddin, Reza Tavakol

TL;DR
This paper analyzes matter density perturbations in f(R) gravity theories within metric and Palatini formalisms, deriving equations under various gauges, and compares their behaviors to constrain deviations from standard cosmology.
Contribution
It provides a detailed derivation of perturbation equations in both formalisms and compares their implications, highlighting the stronger constraints on deviations in the Palatini formalism from galactic scale observations.
Findings
In metric formalism, the deviation parameter m must be very small during the matter era.
In Palatini formalism, matter perturbations impose much tighter constraints on m than background tests.
Perturbation evolution in Palatini models can exhibit rapid growth or damping depending on m's sign.
Abstract
We make a detailed study of matter density perturbations in both metric and Palatini formalisms in theories whose Lagrangian density is a general function, f(R), of the Ricci scalar. We derive these equations in a number of gauges. We show that for viable models that satisfy cosmological and local gravity constraints (LGC), matter perturbation equations derived under a sub-horizon approximation are valid even for super-Hubble scales provided the oscillating mode (scalaron) does not dominate over the matter-induced mode. Such approximate equations are especially reliable in the Palatini formalism because of the absence of scalarons. Using these equations we make a comparative study of the behaviour of density perturbations as well as gravitational potentials for a number of classes of theories. In the metric formalism the parameter m=Rf_{,RR}/f_{,R} characterising the deviation from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
