The impact of going beyond the Maxwell distribution in direct dark matter detection rates
J. D. Vergados, S. H. Hansen, O. Host

TL;DR
This paper compares standard Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distributions with more realistic distributions from simulations to assess their impact on dark matter detection rates and annual modulation signals.
Contribution
It introduces the use of simulation-based velocity distributions in dark matter detection models, highlighting significant differences from traditional assumptions.
Findings
Light targets see ~25% reduction in rate and modulation
Heavy targets have unchanged total rate but up to 50% modulation change
Velocity anisotropy can reduce annual modulation, especially for light targets
Abstract
We consider direct dark matter detection rates and investigate the difference between a standard Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution and a "realistic" distribution like the ones extracted from numerical N-body simulations. Sizable differences are observed when such results are compared to the standard Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. For a light target both the total rate and the annual modulation are reduced by ~25%. For a heavy target the total rate is virtually unchanged, whereas the annual modulation is modified by up to 50%, depending on the WIMP mass and detector energy threshold. We also consider the effect of a possible velocity anisotropy, and the effect is found to be largest for a light target For the realistic velocity distribution the anisotropy may reduce the annual modulation, in contrast to the Maxwell-Boltzmann case.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
