3-groups are not determined by their integral cohomology rings
Ian J. Leary

TL;DR
This paper computes the integral cohomology rings of certain 3-groups and shows that for groups of order 3^n with n ≥ 5, different groups can have identical cohomology rings, indicating non-uniqueness.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the integral cohomology ring does not uniquely determine 3-groups for orders 3^n with n ≥ 5, providing explicit examples.
Findings
Identified pairs of non-isomorphic 3-groups with isomorphic cohomology rings for n ≥ 5
Computed the integral cohomology rings of a specific family of 3-groups
Showed that cohomology rings are not complete invariants for 3-groups
Abstract
We compute the integral cohomology rings of a family of 3-groups. As a corollary, we exhibit, for each n greater than or equal to 5, a pair of groups of order 3^n whose integral cohomology rings are isomorphic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCommutative Algebra and Its Applications · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
