Causal Relationships between Eruptive Prominences and Coronal Mass Ejections
Boris Filippov, Serge Koutchmy

TL;DR
This paper investigates the causal relationship between eruptive prominences and coronal mass ejections (CMEs), proposing a flux rope instability model and suggesting a predictive method based on filament height analysis.
Contribution
It introduces a flux rope instability framework to explain EP-CME associations and proposes using prominence height measurements for eruption prediction.
Findings
Eruptive prominences are near stability limits days before eruption.
Comparison of observed and critical heights can predict filament eruptions.
Analysis of 80 filaments supports the flux rope instability model.
Abstract
A close association between eruptive prominences and CMEs, both slow and fast CMEs, was reported in many studies. Sometimes it is possible to follow the material motion starting from the prominence (filament) activation to the CME in the high corona. Remnants of the prominence were found in the bright core of CMEs. However, detailed comparisons of the two phenomena reveal problems in explaining CMEs as a continuation of filament eruptions in the upper corona. For example, the heliolatitudes of the disappeared filaments and subsequent coronal ejections sometimes differ by tens of degrees. In order to clear up the problems of EP-CME association we tentatively analyse the more general question of the dynamics of a magnetic flux rope. Prominences and filaments are the best tracers of the flux ropes in the corona long before the beginning of the eruption. A twisted flux rope is held by the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
