The multiple quasar Q2237+0305 under a microlensing caustic
T. Anguita (1), R.W. Schmidt (1), E.L. Turner (2), J. Wambsganss (1),, R.L. Webster (3), K.A. Loomis (4), D. Long (4), R. McMillan (4) ((1), ARI/Zentrum fuer Astronomie, University of Heidelberg, (2) Princeton, University, (3) University of Melbourne

TL;DR
This study uses microlensing observations of quasar Q2237+0305 to constrain the sizes of its emitting regions in different bands, revealing details about the quasar's structure and the microlensing environment.
Contribution
The paper provides new constraints on the size of the quasar's emission regions using multi-band microlensing data and simulations, with implications for quasar structure models.
Findings
The r'-band event has a smaller amplitude than the g'-band.
Estimated Gaussian widths of emission regions are on the order of 10^15 cm, depending on microlens mass.
The quasar's continuum region crossed a caustic with >72% confidence.
Abstract
We use the high magnification event seen in the 1999 OGLE campaign light curve of image C of the quadruply imaged gravitational lens Q2237+0305 to study the structure of the quasar engine. We have obtained g'- and r'-band photometry at the Apache Point Observatory 3.5m telescope where we find that the event has a smaller amplitude in the r'-band than in the g'- and OGLE V-bands. By comparing the light curves with microlensing simulations we obtain constraints on the sizes of the quasar regions contributing to the g'- and r'-band flux. Assuming that most of the surface mass density in the central kiloparsec of the lensing galaxy is due to stars and by modeling the source with a Gaussian profile, we obtain for the Gaussian width 1.20 x 10^15 sqrt(M/0.1M_sun)cm < sigma_g' < 7.96 x 10^15 sqrt(M/0.1Msun) cm, where M is the mean microlensing mass, and a ratio…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
