Content Reuse and Interest Sharing in Tagging Communities
Elizeu Santos-Neto, Matei Ripeanu, Adriana Iamnitchi

TL;DR
This paper introduces metrics to measure user collaboration in tagging communities, revealing low levels of content reuse and shared interest that limit social knowledge harnessing, with implications for recommendation and reputation systems.
Contribution
It proposes two novel metrics for quantifying collaboration in tagging communities and applies them to show low collaboration levels in CiteULike and Connotea.
Findings
Low content reuse in communities
Limited shared interest among users
Implications for recommendation systems
Abstract
Tagging communities represent a subclass of a broader class of user-generated content-sharing online communities. In such communities users introduce and tag content for later use. Although recent studies advocate and attempt to harness social knowledge in this context by exploiting collaboration among users, little research has been done to quantify the current level of user collaboration in these communities. This paper introduces two metrics to quantify the level of collaboration: content reuse and shared interest. Using these two metrics, this paper shows that the current level of collaboration in CiteULike and Connotea is consistently low, which significantly limits the potential of harnessing the social knowledge in communities. This study also discusses implications of these findings in the context of recommendation and reputation systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRecommender Systems and Techniques · Expert finding and Q&A systems · Wikis in Education and Collaboration
